Thank you, Calvin.
Did was consult with Al Nyhus and Randy R when spec'ng my 30BR reamer.
I went with what was Randy's original 30BR and went with the changes he had shared numerous times on the Forums. This was from HIS ORIGINAL print with his recommendations. Randy has since come out with a 2nd generation reamer print.
I ordered my reamer from one of the best, JGS.
I went with the initial recommended Harrel die, a #3. It was WAY TOO aggressive in the back end. I could barely get the brass into the sizer. Called Harrels and orderd a #2 and #2.5. When the dies arrived I tried the #2 and have not looked back. The 2.5 sits idly by.
My brass sizes perfectly. If you follow Tony B's book on using a pair of vernier's at the shoulder before and after sizing, they barely drop down. The 2.5 may move the verniers that much further down but I have no brass issues and click issues.
I think the main reason the #3 was to aggressive was the back end was spec'd slightly larger.
Now to get the perfect die to chamber fit with my PPC. That I have it sizing to aggressively in the shoulder area......
Calvin
This (red) is correct. The "fit" between the virgin brass (web diameter), chamber, and die must be compatible: virgin brass smaller than chamber (preferably, at least 0.002" smaller, and more doesn't hurt!), and the die must resize, at least back to original diameter. The Harrell's #3 is a perfect "match" for chambers per the [original] diameter specified Ronnie Long and yours truly, which, at 0.4707", verges on "too small" for the [usually] 0.4690-.4695" LAPUA 6BR NORMA brass.
When we began messing with the 30BR, by Ronnie, I 'lucked out' & had a perfect 'match' using an old 7mmBR die - a Redding type 'S' neck-busing die, with the neck-port opened, using a carbide boring-bar, to prevent sizing via the port wall.
Following many years of responding to requests, assisting re-sizing issues, I began recommending the specification of a LARGER web diameter (0.200" ahead of the bolt-face) dimension: 0.4720", or larger. Also, for many years now, I have been recommending increasing the neck Dia. to, at least, 0.331", which simply accommodates thicker, thus more durable neck-walls (for me, the .330" chamber/ 0.0098" wall thickness) has never been and issue.
Last fall, at the request of
JGS, and following some discussions, I consented to having my name associated with a 30BR reamer, which
JGS has labeled:
30ROBINETTV2. This is an excellent reamer. Contact JGS for specs.
The BIG issue is this: altering a SINGLE dimension makes a reamer, "SOMETHING ELSE" . . . not necessarily good/bad, better/worse, but rather
something else . . . JGS will not change dimensions and leave my moniker attached. Keep 'em
ON the
X! RG