B
BrianJ
Guest
52-i
Good Morning Ed,
Please don't misinterpret what was said here. We are not suggesting these rifles were "cloned" to deceive anybody. In my case I sold the stock and hardware from mine in 1973, not 80's or 90's, to a fellow who wanted a position rifle to shoot. I sold the stock assy. because it was not user friendly in comparison to others. The barreled action on the other hand was terrific and worked well in a prone stock. There was no "trouble and expense" trying to make a clone. It did make economic sense to both of us.
Why use the International barreled action and not a "D"? I had the International. But I agree that in my opinion the "D" was the best action but the "E" had refinments, for better or worse. The main thing was the best barrels ever were the new hammer forged barrels on the "E" International. The "D" didn't have a decent barrel to be competitive and it was necessary to rebarrel them.
As far as size, the "D" heavy and "E" barrels were the same size. The "D" never was made in a bull barrel and that was on the heavy side as well.
Keep in mind rifle competitors are a funny lot and they alter and change at will.
The complete stock and all the hardware was Freeland and this includes the trigger guard.
You must also keep in mind that prior to 1969 Freeland was making these stocks and during 52 International production they continued. As for economic sense I believe it made perfect sense if you owned the 52 "B", "C", "D" and wanted a position rifle to buy only a stock. The stocks and hardware being available from Freeland or Winchester.You can find many and any variation.
In a case such as yours where questions could exist, even if not at the time, documentation is vital and sometimes necessary. Word of mouth is nice, but get it in writing.
Good luck in your collecting. Hope your wife cheers up.
bjm
Good Morning Ed,
Please don't misinterpret what was said here. We are not suggesting these rifles were "cloned" to deceive anybody. In my case I sold the stock and hardware from mine in 1973, not 80's or 90's, to a fellow who wanted a position rifle to shoot. I sold the stock assy. because it was not user friendly in comparison to others. The barreled action on the other hand was terrific and worked well in a prone stock. There was no "trouble and expense" trying to make a clone. It did make economic sense to both of us.
Why use the International barreled action and not a "D"? I had the International. But I agree that in my opinion the "D" was the best action but the "E" had refinments, for better or worse. The main thing was the best barrels ever were the new hammer forged barrels on the "E" International. The "D" didn't have a decent barrel to be competitive and it was necessary to rebarrel them.
As far as size, the "D" heavy and "E" barrels were the same size. The "D" never was made in a bull barrel and that was on the heavy side as well.
Keep in mind rifle competitors are a funny lot and they alter and change at will.
The complete stock and all the hardware was Freeland and this includes the trigger guard.
You must also keep in mind that prior to 1969 Freeland was making these stocks and during 52 International production they continued. As for economic sense I believe it made perfect sense if you owned the 52 "B", "C", "D" and wanted a position rifle to buy only a stock. The stocks and hardware being available from Freeland or Winchester.You can find many and any variation.
In a case such as yours where questions could exist, even if not at the time, documentation is vital and sometimes necessary. Word of mouth is nice, but get it in writing.
Good luck in your collecting. Hope your wife cheers up.
bjm
Last edited by a moderator: