When shooting 100 yards I see people often use 3 wind flags. If you could only use 1 flag at what distance would you place it.
We know that any wind drift on a pellet at close range will compound into a greater change in POI than a wind farther down range.
However a more mid range flag placement my be more indicative of the entire wind profile.
Any mathematicians out there?
Using the "Iterations" method in conjunction with a Point Mass Ballistics Solver, it appears 75% to 80% of what your flags are telling you in regards to where to hold on the target occurs in the first 2/3's of the distance to the target. Approximately 50% of the wind's influence occurs in the first 1/3 of the distance to the target.
If for whatever reason you're somehow forced to use a single flag, it's obvious closer is better, and it's also obvious that you actually have two flags and not one.
The feel of the wind on your hair and/or face on the firing line may be the very best flag in your arsenal and when forced to use one other single flag it might be best to position it somewhere farther downrange between maybe 1/3 and 2/3 of the distance to the target.
Also, and as Kim alluded to, any advice I have is going to be very range and condition specific. For example, the turbulence at the firing line is mostly eliminated with headwinds, but tailwinds could be very tricky to read at or near the bench. Conditions farther downrange can also be susceptible to error due to berms, trees, rise and fall of the terrain, etc.
I've shot enough different ranges over the years that it's become obvious to me you need to be flexible and change your plans based on range terrain and wind conditions.
I or someone else could run a "Monte Carlo" simulation in Excel using the variables of flag distance/target distance and might be able to come up with some hard numbers, but it would mostly be an academic exercise because a single flag just isn't going to provide you with enough data for any type of useful analysis.
Another proviso, I'm not certain if fin stabilization with pellets vs gyroscopic stabilization in RF/CF will behave the same. I do believe fin stabilization with pellets eliminates the Aerodynamic Jump we see in RF/CF and may result in the vertical deflection due to a crosswind being the polar opposite.
Yur gunna need more flags, or yur gunna need someone other than an amateur like me to provide better advice! LOL
Landy