Vern
Morethan1waytoskinacat
I am watching a news piece on CBS this morning where they are talking about what children are exposed to. Caption is WSJ: Bad facebook ads may expose teens to trouble.
The first warning was about a 17 year old who "listed herself" on some dating portion of facebook and could be seen by everyone....
The person being interviewed said that there were worse things happening. HIS first to examples of how terrible this DANGER is was that children 13-17 were exposed to " children were able to see an ad for a GUN holster for a concealed WEAPON" and an ad for "parts for an AK-47".....Then they go right back to talking about the dangers of sexual sites "where teens were asked to come online and be nude webcam models."
Notice they sandwiched the 2 gun issues between 2 sexually oriented warnings about children and facebook
WTH its now a travesty and a horrible danger for kids to see an ad, advertising a legal gun product and compare that to the dangers posed by sexual preditors.
This was not a concept of the news station but by the guy being interviewed. Surprisingly the guy being interviewed had written an article in the Wall Street Journal and these were some of his points in the article.
The whole thing was/is about the dangers of "facebook". I just find it ??????? I dont even have a word for it...
The first warning was about a 17 year old who "listed herself" on some dating portion of facebook and could be seen by everyone....
The person being interviewed said that there were worse things happening. HIS first to examples of how terrible this DANGER is was that children 13-17 were exposed to " children were able to see an ad for a GUN holster for a concealed WEAPON" and an ad for "parts for an AK-47".....Then they go right back to talking about the dangers of sexual sites "where teens were asked to come online and be nude webcam models."
Notice they sandwiched the 2 gun issues between 2 sexually oriented warnings about children and facebook
WTH its now a travesty and a horrible danger for kids to see an ad, advertising a legal gun product and compare that to the dangers posed by sexual preditors.
This was not a concept of the news station but by the guy being interviewed. Surprisingly the guy being interviewed had written an article in the Wall Street Journal and these were some of his points in the article.
The whole thing was/is about the dangers of "facebook". I just find it ??????? I dont even have a word for it...