Looking for ~$500 bench fun

B

benzy2

Guest
I have begun reloading for .223 here of late and seem to really enjoy it. The problem I have is that my only .223 rifle (or anything CF I want to shoot at the range all day) is an AR-15 and while the accuracy isn't bad it isn't the fun I want from a bench gun. I seem to be getting from 1 MOA on the best groups to 2 or so MOA on the larger ones (with the load that seems to shoot the best). This really isn't bad for a $600 AR with a 14x scope tossed on the top. The real problem I run in to consistently is that while it can be made into a real shooter there isn't a good bench style trigger available for anything less than maybe half the price of the gun itself. The the uppers get expensive quick and it doesn't fit my rest real well and it just isn't what I want to spend all day shooting from a bench. It is a ton of fun to shoot fast with and a ton of fun to turn a bunch of fruit into smoothies but that is about it. Im also not dead set on getting another .223 but it seems to be a great round. It gives good accuracy, little recoil, great barrel life, and seems to have a boat load of different components to try in case you want to try any different style of shooting.

So that leaves me looking for a decent "low" end CF bolt action rifle to play with at the range. I have looked at a bunch of different options here and get a bit confused in where I would end with each route.

I started my research with Savage. I am a big fan of their accutriggers and while not a real bench trigger they are as good as it seems I could expect from a factory trigger or and aftermarket one costing less than $100 or so. They also seem to shoot well. Being on a bit of a budget I looked at the 12FV. The heavy barrel seems to get good remarks in accuracy and it is local for about the $500 I was looking to spend. I like the idea that I can easily swap barrels down the road as well. The problem I see here is the stock. They seem worthless. I don't think enough epoxy in the world could make that thing close to sturdy. So a new stock looks to add at least another $100 if I go to the BVSS or get say a B&C stock. That puts me a bit over my budget. Im also buying the heavy barrel to not have to put a different barrel on later. If Im swapping the barrel and stock out I may as well just get one of their target actions for about what the FV costs and turn it into a longer term project. At the same time though being able to swap a Shilen barrel in for an extra 300 bucks and ten minutes of time does seem to be something hard to pass up. An $800 Shilen barreled accu-triggered rifle sounds like a TON of fun in the future and no slouch right now.

The next route was the Remington 700. Another staple in the CF market. Here the problem runs that I don't seem to feel overly confident in the sporter barrel's accuracy. Most of the comments I hear on the 700 is that they make a great platform to grow on. I don't really want to grow. If I'm dumping a lot of money into a gun Im going to go all out. This rifle isn't a platform to grow to me. It is something to get me through college until I am making good money in "the real world". The triggers seem ok on some of the models and in need of serious work on others which is a bit of a concern. It seems to get what Im looking for I will go a bit over budget which is again a big concern.

I have never been impressed by Ruger rifles for the money. I have been down that path with .22LR and regret all the money I spent. Im not looking to do that again.

So now I move to a little smaller company with a CZ 527. The set triggers seem great for what I want to play around with. I love the accuracy of the CZ 452 models I have. The gun just felt small and light. I know it is meant to be a hunting rifle first but it just doesn't seem overly set to be shot from a bench all day. The heavy barrel models seem like a ton of fun but again go a bit over my price range.

Then I looked at the Weatherby Vanguard. While the barrel isn't as heavy as I was hoping for it seems to be a decent shooter out of the box and a possible great shooter with a little work to the trigger and bedding the stock. They also seem to be on the heavy side of things which makes a nicer all day shooter. While .223 doesn't kick much at all every bit of help reducing that is good to me. It seems they can turn the gun into a guaranteed sub-MOA shooter by tossing a pillar bedded stock on it. I don't see them going through shooting all the guns in the regular stock, finding the best, swapping the stocks for the nicer ones, retesting that the guns shoot as well if not better in the new stock and then selling them. The Vanguard is priced too low to go through that much effort to weed out the good ones. They seem built like tanks and not much bad to be said. They are a bit under my price limit as well which helps. Then I thought just get a Howa and skip the rebadge and it gets unclear on what differences there are. I know they are based on the same design but it has been stated more than once that Weatherby sends Howa the specs they want the Vanguard held to and that they may be a better standard than Howa puts into the Howa branded guns.

The Tikka T3 was another option but they seem to have gotten a bit expensive (well from where they were) and only the light weight models fit my budget and we all know that isn't the best option for a bench shooter. I just don't know if I will get the gun I want with what I have to spend.

I had talked about getting a NEF handy rifle and sending it out to get stubbed and have trigger work done. It sounded like I could have a decent shooting (compared to the factory options I have been looking at) barrel put on along with a trigger I could enjoy shooting for about the price I was looking to spend when all said and done. Then I think more and more about it and don't think the break open would be any fun to shoot all day with.

I have looked at the Stevens 200 and it seems to be a good shooting sporter weight barrel. The more I read the more it was obvious it is just a Savage action with the pre-accutrigger on it and the old stock. At that point I think why save the few bucks and have to replace the trigger with say a Rifle Basix and have spent what I would on the current Savage option. Then I get back into the rebarrel option to get a better shooting tube on and then the new stock to go with the new barrel and Im back to just getting a target action from Savage.

I know there was one or two more I had looked at that had potential but for one reason or another just didn't seem right. Im not looking for a real amazing gun but with minimal effort (a little on the trigger and a bedding job) I really want to see at most 1 MOA average if not a little below that. I know thats a bit to ask from an inexpensive rifle but it seems doable with a bit of effort on my end and a loading the gun likes to shoot. If there isn't a route that can fairly reliably get me there for the money Im looking to spend I think I will just dump $500 into a decent bull barreled AR-15 upper with a free floated hand guard. I don't want to go through everything and have another rifle that shoots no better than the 1-2 MOA rifle I have now. I also know that for a little more money there will always be a little nicer rifle out there. I really don't want to spend much if any over $500. This isn't due to the fact I can't afford more than $500 but the fact that I can't justify it much to myself. Being in school money is a bit tight though Im not the poor college kid everyone seems to portray. I just at this point don't have the income to justify tossing a ton of money into something. I have the money if it will get me a worlds nicer gun but again there comes some point where the increase in accuracy just doesn't matter to the kid casually punching paper at the local range.

I think at this point I am leaning towards the Vanguard. It seems to leave the factory at worst a 1.5 MOA shooter with a bit of potential left in the stock/action fit and in the trigger. I have bedded half a dozen .22 rifles and they seem to have all shown good results afterwards. It may not be professional but it seems to work well for the money I end up invested. The Vanguard may not be the best rifle to buy and rebarrel later on or do a ton of additional work/customizing on but Im not looking to do anything much to this so it works for me. I have no real loyalty to try a new Weatherby out though so all logical opinions will definitely be considered in whatever direction that may be.

Sorry for such a long post (and a first post here at that) but I want it to be shown I have put a bit of thought into this and that it isn't just a new member wanting to know what the best gun out there is without thinking at all about what they want.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
About a year ago, I was in the same situation as you; trying to put together an accurate rifle on a budget. I think your assessment of Savage is right on the money. For $500 (I assume that doesn't include optics) the Savage 12 FV is a good choice. For another another $150-200 you can upgrade to a BVSS or VLP (stainless steel and decent, pillar bedded stock). And, as you note, with a $250 Shilen some time in the future, the possibilities are very appealing.

I chose a Savage VLP 223, Nikon Buckmaster scope, Dednutz 1 piece CNC base/ring mount. The stock had about a zillion contact points with the action so I took a dremel to it and epoxy bedded it. It's very accurate for a factory rifle, many loads shoot .5 MOA, a few .3 MOA. I'm really happy with the Savage.
 
For Your requirements I would go Savage, Remington or CZ 527. With the right loads they will all do close to 1/2 MOA at 100yd. Kenny
 
My best factory guns...

My favorite, and best shooting rifles, straight from the factory without modifications have all been Weatherbys, either in Vavguard or MarkV:). They are not as easy to upgrade with aftermarkets products though as it is hard to find a stock inletted for a Weatherby:mad:.
Mt second vote goes to Remington. They seem, to me, to be as accurate as any other stock rifle straight from the factory and aftermarkets products are easier to find and in some cases less expensive than othe makes.

Rocky
 
Savage 12/112 ...yes!

I chose a Savage VLP 223, Nikon Buckmaster scope, Dednutz 1 piece CNC base/ring mount. The stock had about a zillion contact points with the action so I took a dremel to it and epoxy bedded it. It's very accurate for a factory rifle, many loads shoot .5 MOA, a few .3 MOA. I'm really happy with the Savage. Keith

I'd totally agree. Though I haven't seen a VLP or a BVSS have any stock barrel clearance problems with these models. The plastic stock ones...Yes.


The VLP or BVSS stocks will give ya a stable rigid platform that will PERFORM off the bench like you are wanting. Get yourself a box of Brownells Gel bedding compound, follow the directions and you will be VERY happy!

http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/36_62/products_id/78338

Just an example... Yes its a tad over your budget, but Benzy you will have the BEST platform to shoot bugholes from the start. Especially with an easily
applied bedding job and even in stock trim, it'll shoot..!

Then after a some time and you want say a 6BR.... With just a bolt head swap (complete bolthead with extractor and ejector < $60.00) and a quality
custom barrel, your good to go. And become real accuracy spoiled!:D

All but the Savage WILL require future gunsmith for barrel/action mods.
Not that I have anything against Smiths.... It's just the Savage platform is unique in allowing most any mechanically inclined guy/gal to do most their own work to HI standards....
Check here for more Savage info, barrel swaps, Blolt head swaps etc...
http://www.savageshooters.com/

Good luck on your choise!
cale
 
My bad about my Savage, let me clarify. The barrel was nicely free floated but the wood was not adequately relieved around the action so rather than the action resting on the pillars, it contacted the wood. A half hour with the dremel solved the problem.
 
Savage rifles

benzy2: Everyone has an opinion, so here's mine: Tough to beat a factory Savage. I have 2, a mdl 10FP,223 and a 12BVSS originally a 243, now re-chambered to a 6BR. They both will shoot: the 223 averages slightly under moa, and the 6BR is 1/2 moa or slightly less. My son competes, in Florida, with his mdl 10FP, 223 in the F-Class matches at 600 yds and the rifle is competative. He's pushing it to the limits with the 1-9 twist barrel with the Sierra 69 gr. #1380, and has to work very hard in windy conditions. But the rifle delivers. Most others, at 600 yd, are using 1-8 twist with the 75 and 77 gr. to better handle the wind. His load is 26 grs. of Varget (Lyman accuracy load w/ #1380), at a chrono velocity of 2930 fps. Rifle has over 1500 rds. down the barrel, (since last July), and any problems have been "operator related only". When our barrels are shot-out, they will be replaced with Shilen/Pac-Nor, etc. pre-fits, another nice feature of the Savage.
 
[QUOTE
Just an example... Yes its a tad over your budget, but Benzy you will have the BEST platform to shoot bugholes from the start. Especially with an easily
applied bedding job and even in stock trim, it'll shoot..!

Then after a some time and you want say a 6BR.... With just a bolt head swap (complete bolthead with extractor and ejector < $60.00) and a quality
custom barrel, your good to go. And become real accuracy spoiled!:D

All but the Savage WILL require future gunsmith for barrel/action mods.
Not that I have anything against Smiths.... It's just the Savage platform is unique in allowing most any mechanically inclined guy/gal to do most their own work to HI standards....
[/QUOTE]


As Harry Chapin (and caroby) said. There was only just one choice;)
 
A different spin of the Savage

Here's a slightly different suggestion. Buy a Stevens 200 for $259 (catch the sales). Sell the stock and barrel for $80. Lots of places to do that. Get a SSS trigger for $80 (SSS = SharpShooterSupply). Get a Boyd's Laminate BR Varminter stock for $80. Have pillars added and have it bedded to your action, $80. Buy a Shilen Select Match pre-fit for $240 in the caliber and twist of your choice. If you want a true paper-puncher, go ahead and get a 6BR.

The Stevens is the same action as a Savage. I did this for my first Savage rifle last year after getting my factory Remmy bottom smoked for the factory Savages I shoot with. Below is exactly what I put together and what is it capable of. I wouldn't do the thumbhole if I did it over. I am building similar starter rifles for my kids. Easily sub-0.5 MOA. I have 5 different barrels for mine now and swapping barrels is something I do at the range in 15 minutes. Once you have owned a premium barrel, it is hard to mess with factory tubes. The time required to clean them is enough to make me go with a custom barrel.

Stevens 200 $259
Sell stock & barrel -$80
SSS trigger $80
Boyd's BR Varminter $80
Install pillars & bed $50
Shilen Select Match pre-fit $240
Total $629


Luck in your choice, tiny
 

Attachments

  • complete rifle.jpg
    complete rifle.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 478
  • 6mm group-1.jpg
    6mm group-1.jpg
    153.2 KB · Views: 423
JUST to get in a word for the 6BR...............;) .............let's make one thing perfectly clear, the 6BR IS NOT just a paper puncher. The 6BR is an "extreme" cartridge that does a lot of stuff really well including punching paper.



The only reason that I bring this up is because a lotta' folks get the idea that these Benchrest chamberings like BR and PPC are "so specialized that they're only good for poking holes in paper"........nothing could be farther from the truth! Either a 6BR or a 6PPC will flat out run rings around the 22-250, in fact a 6BR will hang right there with the .243 Winchester round in ALL aspects except that it will always show much better accuracy. I remember once an article in either PS or Accurate Rifle or VHA's mag where they were interviewing a bunch of guys about "The Ultimate Varmint Rifle" and Jim Borden stepped up and said "the 6PPC"!!!!


Think about it, the "wimpy little paper-puncher" 6PPC will push a 55gr Nosler Ballistic Tip at 3800fps, FASTER than a 22-250 and with MUCH better accuracy.


I'm not picking on tiny's choice of words when he says "paper puncher" I'm just saying that you really do owe it to yourself to try a 6BR, it'll open your eyes. Just get'cherself an .272nk 6BR with about .060 freebore in an 8-inch twist and have a BALL!


:)


al
 
Another vote for Savage

I would get a Savage 10FP (I have three) in either 223 or 308 either in the longer barrel length. The 223 should group better (under .5 MOA) but will not hold up at well 1000 yards due to the 1:9 twist not stablizing heavy bullets. The 308 should shoot about .6 MOA and will hold up to 1000 yards and it will stablize 175 gr SMK's.

As time passes, you can add a stock and possibly a premium barrel. There are tons of options open to a Svage shooter due tothe changable hold faces and barrel fastening system.

But in the mean time you will be good to go and gaining experience on the line.

:p
 
Thanks for all the responses. I was thinking of going .223 but I would be reloading basically all the rounds coming out of it so I might as well do it right with a 6br. I like the Stevens idea since I had thought about putting a new barrel and stock on anyways. How nice though is the SSS trigger? That was the biggest concern I had with the preaccutrigger setup and was what had held me back from buying the Stevens in the past. The more I hear and read about going with the 6br the more excited I get. I started out wanting a out of the box shooter but the more I think about this the more I think with a little more money I could have a much better shooter. More to think about.
 
Savage 243 to 6BR

benzy2: In your original post, it sounded like you wanted to stay with the 223? If you would consider the 6BR, I agree with the other posts, above: it is a far better choice if you are looking for some of the best accuracy available. I've re-chambered my Savage mdl 12BVSS from the factory 243 ( would hold moa w/ 5 shots, most of the time), to a 6BR w/ a .272" no-turn neck. I now have a rifle that will consistently hold under 1/2 moa with 5 shots, and that's with the Savage factory 1-9.25 twist barrel. As viewed w/ my "Hawkeye" borescope, it's far from a match barrel, but it shoots! As an added bonus, I have much longer barrel life, compared to the "barrel burning" 243,( I know, I shot out 2, both at a documented 1400 rds ). One of my rifle builder/gunsmiths once commented : if you want a really accurate varmint rifle, why don't you just chamber to one of the benchrest cartridges? I've done that (6ppc, 22BR, and 3 6BRs') and never looked back. Happy New Year
 
Addition to above

The "clicking finger" works faster than the brain, sorry. In my above post, shortly after your original, I mentioned my son competing in F-Class in Florida. The match he fired last week-end was won with a ??? 6BR: a perfect score of 600x600, in windy conditions, and with a high x-count ( 3" dia.).
 
Stevens IMHO

Triggers are a thing of personal preference. I like a very light, crisp trigger with no creep. Even my coyote rig is in the 1 pound range. I wouldn't recommend that for most. The SSS trigger has really work well for me. It is completely adjustable and can be reduced to about 6-8 oz and up to about 2 lbs. After I put one on my Stevens, I liked it so much that I replaced my AccuTrigger on my Savage. Many love the AccuTrigger. I am not one of them. Again personal choice. If you really want some insight on the Steven/Savages, check out www.savageshooters.com. You get a basis trail membership for free. Ask questions or just read what others are doing. Lots of Savage info. For about $100, SSS will true and time your action. If you want to get more serious about groups it is a good idea. Warning, I think the waiting list is almost a year long. I am on the list. My smith squared my Steven face so the recoil lug would fit flat and made sure the threads were square to the face. $35. I can't complain. I don't know if it is necessary or not. Many guys shoot great groups right out of the box with a factory barrel. My witnessing this is what made me get one. I still have many more Remmies in my safe and a few have been worked over (blue-printed with custom barrels and triggers) and are outstanding shooters, by they are +$1000 investments.

One thing to consider about the Stevens is the stock issue. My is a long action, but I shoot a 22-250, 22-250 AI, 6mm Rem, 6mm Rem AI, and have another custom on the way. I use a follower and shoot it as a single shot. The issue is stock availability. Savage is in the process of switching over to a new type of magazine called "in-line". The magazine attaches to the stock. All of the aftermarket stocks I know of are still the older staggered magazine style with the magazine attached to the action. The two have a slightly different screw spacing. The inline style is supposed to have resolved some of the feeding issues that people experienced with their Savage/Stevens. To make it more confusing, some of the rifles out there on the selves are still the older style staggered magazine and some are the newer in-lines. I think Savage was still using the older style on the short action Stevens 200 in 2007, but the long actions had made the switch. I am not positive on that. It becomes a concern on buying and aftermarket stock. I greatly like the BVSS stock that comes on the factory Savages.

Hope that didn't confuse you, tiny
 
Last edited:
Theres no doubt a custom 6BR barrel would offer more accuracy than a factory tube. And easier to obtain accuracy to boot.
I wouldn't discount a varmint contoured Savage factory tube though. It doesn't hurt to start there. Theres a whole lot of education you might be missing jumping straight into a custom tube. Every Savage barrel I've tamed has taught me something. Its best to pay your dues on a factory tube. Its a long way from 1-2 moa down to .25 moa or better. Some might not agree with that philosophy. Thats OK.

The SSS trigger now goes down to 12ozs. I believe they used to be a little harder. If you choose that trigger make sure your model goes down to twelve.

I use Rifle Basix triggers on my Savage rigs. Reportedly can go down to 4ozs. More realistically they function reliably at 7ozs. I could set them a touch lighter but sometimes they'll trip the sear while cycling the action.
Three RB triggers. All set for reliable functioning in separate actions. All three break at 7ozs. I'd call it 7ozs.

The important thing to remember is the Savage will allow you to economically swap barrels. Once you've turned a barrel nut theres no place else to go but full blown custom.
There really is just one choice.
 
Im also not dead set on getting another .223 but it seems to be a great round. It gives good accuracy, little recoil, great barrel life, and seems to have a boat load of different components to try in case you want to try any different style of shooting.

Not sure what ranges you are shooting at but the .223 in a good factory rifle can be surprisingly accurate. If you are looking to stay with an out of the box rifle the .223 should do very well for target shooting. Even when using match components it is one of the least expensive centerfire rounds to reload.

I use it in 3 rifles and one 14" TC Contender. The .223 rifle I own that comes closest to your $500 budget is a Rem 700 SPS Varmint , was on sale for $479 with $30 rebate and came with a scope but it really was a cheapie and you will want better optics. The X-Mark Pro trigger on mine was pretty good for a 700 , just a little over 3lbs which is probably NOT the norm. I installed a Jewell anyway and also installed it in a HS stock. The rifle shoots the 52 Sierra match with excellent accuracy. It is a 1 in 12" twist so it will be used for the lighter bullets.

I also have a 1 in 9" twist Savage 12BVSS I had the Accu-Trigger replaced with a SSS unit - set at about 14oz. Not a Jewell but still pretty good. About the only complaint I have with this rifle is the fact that the bore takes no time at all to foul. I plan to possibly have a Lothar Walther barrel installed. If you are sure you will change calibers or add a match barrel later the Savage will allow you to do this with the least expense.

My 700 LTR is the best of my .223s but the prices have risen dramatically in the last few years. It too is a 1 in 9" twist. The 700 SPS Tactical is one which is a little over your budget but is similar to the LTR in size.
 
As I said im not dead set on .223 it just is something I am familiar with and something readily available. I started wanting a box stock gun but the more I think about it I wouldn't be against turning a stock gun into a better gun. I really guess I was looking to avoid getting a gun and sending it to a smith to have $500 of labor and another $1000 in parts to get a real nice shooter. I see so many options for the 700 out there that raise the cost into a truly custom price range. I have decent confidence I can fit a new stock to the action and there seem to be affordable quality stocks out there. The barrel installation seems straight forward. The trigger swaps seem easy. Everything seems to be something I could do, well beside truing the action. It also seems like for a while until I have confidence the gun is what is holding my group sizes up I can work with the out-of-the-box configuration and have fun there as well. I didn't realize how user friendly the Savage was to those looking to tinker. It has definitely moved up the scale of interest. I may go with the Stevens and a Rifle Basics or SSS trigger for a while and see where it goes from there.
 
Ok been thinking a little more as well. If I do think Im going to end up switching to a 6br barrel down the road and have no real need to stick with .223 in the factory form would I be better off going with say a 22-250 or .308 so the bolt head would remain the same? Since there is no real dedication to .223 I could be just as happy shooting a 22-250 and when the barrel shows signs it is giving up the ghost I would then switch to say the 6br. Or I could even go with a .243 and try out the 6mm round a bit first. If I do get a sporter contoured barrel I could see taking it on a hunt or two and while .243 may be a bit over kill on some of the smaller varmints it would seem to be a better round from a ballistics point of view as would the 22-250. A new bolt head later on though isn't a real big deal. The .22-250 wouldn't cost much more to load than .223 and the .243 would be a little more expensive but still not enough to keep me from shooting it.

What are the common thoughts on the .22-250 or the .243 around here?
 
Get a Boyd's Laminate BR Varminter stock for $80.

Where can I find this stock? I didn't know there was a BR Varminter from Boyd and the Varminters that I had seen didn't come inletted for the Savage actions. A little help here would be great as a quality stock at $80 seems to be something worth taking a look at.
 
Back
Top