Bob Kingsbury
New member
Thanks fellas
From what I can tell, the benchrest crowd shoots at the ragged edge of stability (Sg 1.00)
From what I can tell, the benchrest crowd shoots at the ragged edge of stability (Sg 1.00) and the long range crowd shoots fully stabilized (Sg 1.4). It seems velocity can compensate for lack of stability at short range, but if the bullet isn’t fully stabilized at the muzzle it will not stabilize further down range and that shows up at longer distances. If you shoot the same bullet, say a .224 55 gr V-Max (nominal length .816”) at 3140 fps in a 1:9 twist (Sg 1.82), a 1:12 twist (Sg 1.02), and a 1:14 twist (Sg 0.75) with everything else equal the difference in the group size should increase over distance (and a bullet may keyhole). If you increase the velocity to 4000 fps with the 1:14 twist, the Sg is still only 0.81. The optimum twist would be 1:10. Your choices of twist are somewhat limited with factory rifles.
I won’t even pretend that I understand the calculations, and there may be some exceptions, but it has worked for me. I shoot both a 1:9 and 1:12 twist .223 so I’ve been able to compare the same bullet at two different levels of stability and there is a difference.
I’ve been developing loads for a friend. He gave me an assortment of 6mm bullets and the first thing I did was measure the length of each and calculate the Sg and ranked them from highest to lowest for a 1:12 twist with 1.40 being the cut-off and only worked with the bullets of 1.40 and above. He was able to shoot a 0.25” group at 200m.
German Salazar did a test of varying Sg over distance and you can read the article and links at: http://riflemansjournal.blogspot.com/2010/06/ballistics-heavy-bullets-in-113-twist.html
- nhk
I've never used the ballistic tip Noslers in any 22 centerfire rifle, so I cannot compair them. But as I said before I shoot the Vmax bullets all the time in my .223's without a hitch. How much different are they? I would like to think that with 300 fps faster velocity in the same twist barrel they'd also stabalize.
gary
These are factory rifles, they only come with the 1-14 tw. By the way the 55 grain Hornady is a flat base, the Nosler 55 grain is a boattail.
Gary, if you would like to try some nosler bt let me know. I prefer them over the Vmax.
What I'd really like to do is to find a 60 grain bullet that grouped .50" or less in the 22-250, and yet work well on coyotes.
gary
The .22-250 at 3568 fps, the accuracy load in the #6 Nosler guide, (1:14 twist, 183,497 rpm) with the 55 gr Ballistic Tip has an Sg of 0.79, which is not stable.
If you incresed the velocity to 3665 fps, the rpm would equal 188,486 like the .223, but the Sg would still only be 0.80.
Gary, the 60 gr. Nosler Partitions are serious coyote bullets. The ones I have measure .790 long...shorter than both the Nosler 50 gr. BTips (.800 long) and the 55 gr. BTips (.810 long). They've shot well in both 223's and 22-250 twisted 1:14.
Good shootin'. -Al
Gary, I have a #1 V stainless in 22.250, and a Cooper in 220 Swift, both with 1 in 14 twist. The swift digests the 55 gr Sierra Blitzkings extremely well low to mid 2s for 5 shot groups in 3 diffrent nodes, 3300, 3500, and 3750 fps. The 22.250 will also shoot these extremly well, but likes to be pushed towards the top end, and seated about 15 thou longer than what Sierras manual states. If I seat them to manual specs and slow them down a couple hundred fps, I do get a little bit of keyholeing.
As far as the 52 and 53 gr the 250 really shines when loaded at the middle to top and seated out a little, whereas the swift likes them just about any velocity and seated to 5 thou under touching the lands. But then again my swift has a very tight chamber, and touches the lands at manual stated seating depth. My 250 has a chamber with a very long throat which gives me alot of jump unless seated out.
As was stated by another poster, I really doubt that twist is the problem, as the 55 gr bullet is considered the optimum weight for both in a 1 in 14.
I dont put much credence in twist calculators as I use the Sierra infinity program which has one and it is based on the greenhill formula. I have never been able to come up with a bullet to velocity that matches the twist rate for any of my rifles, unless I go to a 100 to 200 fps overload. And this is plugging in data for Sierras own bullets. Real world results from the field is more reliable.
And to back my statement on this if you can find a copy of F.W. Manns book The Bullets Flight, From Powder to Target, first published in 1908, then again in 1947, you will gain alot of knowledge as this still is considered a must have for any ballistition. 38 years of actual test data, and the first real definitive look at real world external ballistics.
Good Luck
DR