CCBW did Paul Wolf put something in your morning coffee?.
I wish!
CCBW did Paul Wolf put something in your morning coffee?.
I don't know what makes it good. I do know that once you find that it's good, let it alone and buy barrels. A good rifle will win with a good barrel while a poor rifle will not - EVER. I often wonder how many good barrels are worn out on poor rifles.
Here's what I'm saying! The folks that win regularly have a good rifle and buy a lot of barrels. That's it! If you can't figure out why they're winning and you're not....then I'm telling you straight up. They have a better rifle than the rifle you shoot! They're sitting there waiting on the lightest condition and quickly shooting five shots - win or lose. Their rifle will shoot through that small stuff and yours won't.
That's the bottom line. The absolute bottom line. Sure, there's days that the wind doesn't let up and a .3XX rifle has a chance. There are also rifles that shoot well one day and not the next.."finicky" rifles. I think that's the worst case as it keeps you from swapping rifles.
If your rifle will not agg in the low twos on the best day it's not the rifle you should have. You're not doing anything to keep it from shooting...it just won't shoot...and you can't make it shoot.
There's been no posts to this thread in a while..just wondering. Does everybody agree or is it because you're being nice to me?
Are you saying that the winner simply reads the wind conditions better than others?
________________________
I'll add to that a bit. The winner really does read the wind conditions better than others but does not have to read them better than ALL others - just the competitors that have a competitive rifle.
No, what I think is that there several things that bring a win, otherwise the person with the hummer barrel would win them all . Look at the most recent St Louis shoot. If there were 2,3 even 4 hummers they would dominate the winnings. As was some of the winners of one agg might be in 18th place on the next agg in the same yardage, on the same day
First, you must have a gun that WILL shoot winning groups. Here I agree with TB probably 2/3 of the shooters do not have tunes that COULD win at that tune condition
(Were the tune of that gun brought to maximum it probably be competitive). (Many shooters never change their load. If it shot great once it will shoot great all the time with that load---wrong!)
Secondly, the shooter must have the gun handling ability to make a potentially winning gun perform to its maximum.
Third, the shooter must HAVE conditions that CAN be read and have the ability to read them.
And fourth, but not final, the winning shooter must have some good LUCK!!
(Remember, there is good luck and bad luck, i.e. if two shooters, up to this point were equal, the one with the better luck WILL win!)
.
I do know that once you find that it's good, let it alone and buy barrels. A good rifle will win with a good barrel while a poor rifle will not - EVER. I often wonder how many good barrels are worn out on poor rifles.
There's been no posts to this thread in a while..just wondering. Does everybody agree or is it because you're being nice to me?
I bought a rifle from a friend that lost his job. I knew it was a killer (he did too) and paid accordingly...never regretted it one minute....The other side of the story is that the rifle came with a barrel that simply wouldn't shoot....until I tried some "fat" bullets....
I'm gonna click the Submit button because my wife says it's time for me to cook something.
No, what I think is that there several things that bring a win, otherwise the person with the hummer barrel would win them all . Look at the most recent St Louis shoot. If there were 2,3 even 4 hummers they would dominate the winnings. As was some of the winners of one agg might be in 18th place on the next agg in the same yardage, on the same day
First, you must have a gun that WILL shoot winning groups. Here I agree with TB probably 2/3 of the shooters do not have tunes that COULD win at that tune condition
(Were the tune of that gun brought to maximum it probably be competitive). (Many shooters never change their load. If it shot great once it will shoot great all the time with that load---wrong!)
Secondly, the shooter must have the gun handling ability to make a potentially winning gun perform to its maximum.
Third, the shooter must HAVE conditions that CAN be read and have the ability to read them.
And fourth, but not final, the winning shooter must have some good LUCK!!
(Remember, there is good luck and bad luck, i.e. if two shooters, up to this point were equal, the one with the better luck WILL win!)
.
As to seeing a grey beard, that definitely would describe Ron Hoehn in the Wright City area. For anyone looking to get into benchrest in the St. Louis area, a stop by his shop immediately south of the benchrest range would be worthwhile. Ron will point you in the right direction. As Wilbur said watch out for the gadgets. Benchrest has lots of gadgets. Gadgets that someone makes to sell to do a particular job. Picked up one of those gadgets at St. Louis at the Nationals. It doesn't make you shoot any better. But can save time and trouble.
I picked up one of PMA's bullet pullers. They must have been very well received as Pat sold all of them he brought. I was previously using the Hood tool that combined with a Davidson puller. I use pretty high neck tension and couldn't pull them with the Davidson. The PMA tool didn't have any problem with freshly seated bullets. .263" loaded round using a .258" bushing. Lot more seating pressure than is normally used.
Wilbur, I agree with that 100%. A rifle has to be competitive and some rifles just aren't competitive. A friend of mine worked on trying to get a barrel to shoot for three years without much luck. He finally gave up on it and installed a new barrel and his rifle became competitive. Another friend of mine had two identical rifles. One shot like a house afire with every barrel he put on it. The other didn't. He sold it to a friend of his who thought he could make it work. The verdict is still out on whether he can get it to work or not.
.