BTW, this is priceless..... you can't make this stuff UP! I'll just save it here so's you can't "edit it"
.001 inch eh?
Are you absolutely SURE you're measuring the same thing as the other shooters?
And would you be willing to actually TEST this for us? Just thrun some charges and post the data...... I'll believe it, really
(This will NEVER happen!)
Ohhh, and if you want to compare ACTUAL data points, I've got reams and reams of actual documented, dated throwing data. Many different powders...... I wouldn't even have to go do the testing.
As I've ALREADY DONE IT.....
unlike you
al
Uthink Uknow
Personally, and isn't that what it's about, I like and have the Harrell measure(s) with the bearings. They drop extremely accurately and I have the targets and/or awards to prove it. My measures drop to within .001 inch.
I tire of those who go into long dissertations about what is wrong with dropping charges and use a scale that measures to .001 grains but can't back any of this up with targets. I understand there is a lot more than the weight of charges when it come to accuracy.
Positive ID? No. But then I can tell the difference between the Gospel according to Matthew and A Christmas Story by Charles Dickens.
.001 inch eh?
Are you absolutely SURE you're measuring the same thing as the other shooters?
And would you be willing to actually TEST this for us? Just thrun some charges and post the data...... I'll believe it, really
(This will NEVER happen!)
Ohhh, and if you want to compare ACTUAL data points, I've got reams and reams of actual documented, dated throwing data. Many different powders...... I wouldn't even have to go do the testing.
As I've ALREADY DONE IT.....
unlike you
al