VG,
I have been away to a match and have just returned home, and to computer access, I just finished reading your reply to my question.
Yikes!!! Am I ever surprised to find out that you have elevated the young lady who represented Cooper at the open house from someone that "that I am pretty sure I know" to the status of "your lady friend". I hope her husband doesn't find out about this - heck! until I read your reply I didn't even know that she was a lady friend.
Egads!!! You may want to read my post again - if you notice the subject of the paragraph is Cooper rifles - my reply to you was -
"I am curious as in what sense the young lady representing Cooper rifles seemed naive. The reason I ask this is that I am pretty sure I know who was there representing them and if you are referring to her as being naive in regards to the rifles I believe you may be badly mistaken. I am quite sure that she knows more about them than you do."
It seems quite clear that I am referring to her knowing more about Cooper rifles than you do. You have posted numerous times that you have never owned a Cooper, nor do you intend to so therefore your exposure to them is at best somewhat limited, wheras she works at the Cooper facility, she is exposed to them every day and Cooper management has enough confidence in her knowledge to have her represent them.
Gadzooks!!! Can't you reply to a post without an attempt to denigrate the person that you reply to??? Was it really necessary to put this into the post - "But if you think the woman there had more knowledge of Rifles than I do then you are way out in left field - no, make that way out in outer space!", are you that insecure??
Sheesh!!! Keep spitting into the wind VG.
drover
I have been away to a match and have just returned home, and to computer access, I just finished reading your reply to my question.
Yikes!!! Am I ever surprised to find out that you have elevated the young lady who represented Cooper at the open house from someone that "that I am pretty sure I know" to the status of "your lady friend". I hope her husband doesn't find out about this - heck! until I read your reply I didn't even know that she was a lady friend.
Egads!!! You may want to read my post again - if you notice the subject of the paragraph is Cooper rifles - my reply to you was -
"I am curious as in what sense the young lady representing Cooper rifles seemed naive. The reason I ask this is that I am pretty sure I know who was there representing them and if you are referring to her as being naive in regards to the rifles I believe you may be badly mistaken. I am quite sure that she knows more about them than you do."
It seems quite clear that I am referring to her knowing more about Cooper rifles than you do. You have posted numerous times that you have never owned a Cooper, nor do you intend to so therefore your exposure to them is at best somewhat limited, wheras she works at the Cooper facility, she is exposed to them every day and Cooper management has enough confidence in her knowledge to have her represent them.
Gadzooks!!! Can't you reply to a post without an attempt to denigrate the person that you reply to??? Was it really necessary to put this into the post - "But if you think the woman there had more knowledge of Rifles than I do then you are way out in left field - no, make that way out in outer space!", are you that insecure??
Sheesh!!! Keep spitting into the wind VG.
drover
Last edited: