Dick Grosbier
Club Coordinator
Is my Harrel die the wrong size?
NO.
At least not based on anything you said in that post.
Is my Harrel die the wrong size?
I have to disagree with Dick. If you are not bumping the shoulder and the shoulder/neck junction and the base is being sized down .003, then you have a die/chamber match problem.
Hovis
I did some more checking today. I'm not sure what this means. Possibly my Harrel die is not a good fit.
I backed my die out so when I measure with my brass piece there is no shoulder set back at all.
But the diameter of an un sized case at the shoulder is .003 larger than a sized case. When I lock my micrometer down on an un sized case it slides down 1/4" or so on the sized case. The shoulder measurement with the brass comparator is the same.
Boyd asked me to check this the other day I guess I screwed up some how taking all the measurements.
Is my Harrel die the wrong size?
Mr. Singleton,
At the risk of offending you, here's what I'd suggest.
First, buy some already prepped brass from, say, Ron Hoehn
http://www.benchrest.com/hoehn/html/ammo___brass.html
Done this myself in the days I was working and had more money than time. It costs a little, but it will be correct. In your case, save your own brass for your next set of cases, you'll need them soon enough, and downstream, you'll know enough so you won't waste money by ruining cases.
Second, get a kinda, sorta mentor. You don't say where you're from, but likely there is some experienced benchrest shooter at a nearby range (else you got even more trouble -- where you going to shoot? Against whom?)
It is all confusing at first. I still remember, even though it's been 25+ years. The guy I bought my rifle from helped me through the first steps. I wasn't really good to go then, but it did save me some frustration and wasted money.
For example: Your die doesn't bump the shoulder -- but that could be a factor of how far you're shoving the case into the die. If you shove the case in further, at some point, the shoulder will be bumped. What's going on just now involves several variables; I'm not sure you've presented things so that what's being said is appropriate. We on the forum make assumptions, too.
The .003 reduction AFTER the case is taken from the die does seem a bit much -- .001 is ideal, but I'd not be sure of your measurements at this point.
What really matters at this point is getting reasonable ammunition, and a lot of practice. The internet is a good place for swapping all sorts of technical information, a bad place to practice shooting. But you're already overloaded with technical information. Too much, some of it wrong.
I haven't read Tony Boyer's new book, but I've read some of the things he wrote (interviews, really) from the late 1990s. Good stuff. Emphasis on what should be emphasized. I also know some of the people involved in it's publication (Larry Costa); he's good people too. I suspect that would be more value to you than continued internet talk at this point.
Good luck to you.
I live in western NC close to TN line. Not a short range benchrest part of the country.
Tim
Tim,
http://www.unakarodandgun.com/
Moving on to Tennessee, Jerry Sharrett is in the Eastern part of Tennessee (he posts here), as is Jeff Summers. Jeff doesn't post to BR central, but he does do things like win the Super Shoot (twice). Not sure where they shoot aside from Unaka, but I think there is another range involved with BR in Eastern Tennessee near the Carolina border.
Could be worse for you -- I live in Durham. Unaka is about a 4 hour drive for me & I've been known to go to matches there.
Boyd, on the other hand, lives in California...
all calibers shot are pluggged with a .30 this year, so a PPC is at no disadvantage.
That sounds like an interesting alternative to using the ultimate benchrest targets; I wonder why all clubs don't do that.
Because the people who spend more money for the larger bullets and absorb the increased recoil, to get the advantage of a larger hole, would suddenly be disadvantaged.
The alternate view seems to be "we need more shooters." But then, if what you want is more shooters, why not offer sexual gratification, drugs, and booze? Whorehouses have a record of success dating back several millennium.
But then, if what you want is more shooters, why not offer sexual gratification, drugs, and booze? Whorehouses have a record of success dating back several millennium.
No, I don't. I was one of the old geezers who remarked that the changes to American Skeet (allowing the shooter to start gun up & requiring an instantaneous pull) were a bad ideas. But everyone wanted to brag they broke 25 straight. Now many national-level shooters won't even go out on a windy day, for fear they won't go the whole year without a miss. And when we have to compete with the rest of the world, International style, we're at a disadvantage.Cnarles, I stopped shooting trap because of all the sex, violence and money payoffs. Now you want to corrupt this upstanding sport!!
Perhaps we're getting off-topic? IMSLTHO, What Mr. Singleton needs to do is go shoot, so when he shoots poorly, as almost all beginners do, he won't be trying to blame the performance on minor technical things.