Borescope
Bought a new Hawkeye, 17" Deluxe from Lester Bruno, 3 years ago. At that time he beat other "best prices", by at least $80, and have never regretted the purchase. Yes, I agree, sometimes a really ugly barrel will shoot consistant 1/2 moa 5 shot groups ( like my factory Re. 700, 222 Rem), and other times a perfect-looking bore, made by a highly regarded barrel maker cannot be made to shoot- no matter what is done. It has more than paid for itself: Looking at a used Rem 700 that the owner claimed he "only put a couple of boxes thru it". Must have been "boxes" of several thousand rounds, cause the barrel looked like a sewer pipe! Had to resist calling him a liar, after showing him what his barrel condition really was ( with the borescope), I paid him for the receiver only. Another time, received a custom barrel, and before the g'smith began his very costly machining (Ruger#1) discovered reamer and tool marks across the lands & grooves- this with a barrel that was claimed to have been "hand-lapped". Back it went, later returned, 'scoped, now was perfect, and the Ruger#1 ( believe it or not) is very accurate: averages under moa w/ 5 shot groups (223 Rem 1-9 twist). it does provide unarguable evidence of cleaning results: I know what works, and what does not work, for me. Those who make wild, off-the-wall claims about cleaning results, when using "Product/ solvent, etc. X ", have no idea what they are talking about, unless they are able to inspect the bore under lighted 25x magnification. Guess that may be some of the reasons you will seldom see a used "Hawkeye" advertised for sale. One went thru an estate sale last summer, and selling price was only a few dollars less than new. I'm sold on them and would not be without.