Joe,
I think everyone here really appreciates your posts and the manner in which you answer questions or give your opinions in a understandable manner.
There many questions when it comes to tuning a rifle but for this thread, would you please explain what you looking for or at on a target when it pertains to the size of the holes that the bullet cuts in the paper, the color of the ring around the bullet and touch a little on how a group should form on the target.
You opinions would be greatly appreciated. The reason I am asking this is simple, I was shooting next to Mr. Costa at the Hog Roast, and about the second group on Sunday, he made a comment to Lee H. and I that he was going to go back to tuning by looking at the target instead of tuning by atomspheric conditions/changes that he'd been doing lately. Joe, you are very good at this and would like for you to expound on it. I think a lot of people get wrapped around the axle saying "If it isn't proven by science, then it has no weight or value". But I find it really funny that the best in this game don't use science to try to shoot better, they use what they see. I have been trying different things over the last couple of years and the only thing that has been consisant is my lower and lower placings. Basically, complicating the simple.
Hovis
Hovis
I think everyone here really appreciates your posts and the manner in which you answer questions or give your opinions in a understandable manner.
There many questions when it comes to tuning a rifle but for this thread, would you please explain what you looking for or at on a target when it pertains to the size of the holes that the bullet cuts in the paper, the color of the ring around the bullet and touch a little on how a group should form on the target.
You opinions would be greatly appreciated. The reason I am asking this is simple, I was shooting next to Mr. Costa at the Hog Roast, and about the second group on Sunday, he made a comment to Lee H. and I that he was going to go back to tuning by looking at the target instead of tuning by atomspheric conditions/changes that he'd been doing lately. Joe, you are very good at this and would like for you to expound on it. I think a lot of people get wrapped around the axle saying "If it isn't proven by science, then it has no weight or value". But I find it really funny that the best in this game don't use science to try to shoot better, they use what they see. I have been trying different things over the last couple of years and the only thing that has been consisant is my lower and lower placings. Basically, complicating the simple.
Hovis
Hovis