B
BenKeith
Guest
When mention is made of a 243 or 260, it's mostly associated with the fact they are good calibers for kids and women. Thursday I was in Acadamy Sports and they had one of those cheap, black Remingtons in a 243 and I was just wanting to look at the rifle but told a young clerk to let me look at that 243. He got a puzzled look on his face and ask "why", that's a ladies gun, you probably want to look at a 270 or 30-06. I told him no, I wanted to look at that one and he commented back again, "but we don't never sell them to men" and asked why I would want something like that. My comment back was "look, I know how to shoot, I don't need a friggin shoulder cannon" an older clerk laughed and said "I like that answer".
After all, if they are perceived as only being good for kids and women, because of the reduced recoil, and not very good deer/hunting rifles, then they must figure the women and kids have to be better shots than men, for them to be able to use them for hunting.
I guess I'm still a kid because for 45 years, the lions share of my hunting and shooting has been with a 6mm, and haven't had one to walk away from it yet.
After all, if they are perceived as only being good for kids and women, because of the reduced recoil, and not very good deer/hunting rifles, then they must figure the women and kids have to be better shots than men, for them to be able to use them for hunting.
I guess I'm still a kid because for 45 years, the lions share of my hunting and shooting has been with a 6mm, and haven't had one to walk away from it yet.